Massachusetts sheriff threatens to turn away federal detai

By Rick Vincent and Barbara Hall, CNN Radio August 21, 2010 4:38 p.m. EDT

Suffolk County Sheriff Andrea Cabral says the $8 million her department got to house federal prisoners is not enough. STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Sheriff is warning feds that their detainees will be turned away
  • Sheriff Andrea Cabral is calling for more respect and communication
  • ICE officials are reviewing her concerns


(CNN) -- Federal authorities are reviewing concerns from a Massachusetts  sheriff who is threatening to reject federal detainees at her jail.

In  an August 13 letter to the U.S. Bureau of Immigration and Customs  Enforcement, Suffolk County Sheriff Andrea Cabral noted a "staggering  lack of communication and respect" from the federal agency.

She  told CNN Radio that if her concerns aren't addressed, ICE "would no  longer be allowed to house federal detainees at the Suffolk County  Sheriff's Department. They would have to take them to a different  facility."

ICE is reviewing Cabral's letter and will offer a direct response to her concerns, said Harold Ort, a spokesman for the agency.

"We  remain committed to reforming the nation's civil detention system and  will continue to work closely with our state and local partners to  ensure that these necessary reform measures are successfully  implemented," he said.

Cabral received $8 million this year to  house about 260 federal detainees at a time. She says the amount is much  less than it seems after costs are weighed in.

"The state allows  us to have a retained revenue account, and that simply means that  you're getting revenue from a source other than state appropriation,"  she said. "Your state appropriation is then diminished by the amount of  money you may bring in from an outside source, and in this case that's a  federal reimbursement," she said.

"Our retained revenue account is $8 million a year. We spend more than $6 million a year staffing the building."

Cabral  said her department is specifically frustrated with ICE not sending  documentation about the Suffolk jail, including federal audits and  complaints from detainees.

Most recently, she said she was  unaware of the findings of a federal investigation into the October  death of a federal detainee until they were reported by Boston media.

"There  hasn't been that level of communication and information sharing, and  it's very important that we're able to be very consistent with issues in  this department," she said.

CNN Radio's Ninette Sosa contributed to this report.

image8
image9

Boston's Annual Homeless Census Held On Bitter Cold night

February 1, 2019

BOSTON — On one of the coldest nights so far this winter hundreds of volunteers took to the streets to conduct Boston's 39th annual homeless census. The count is part of a larger census of homeless adults and families in emergency shelters, transitional housing and domestic violence programs. 

"We have prioritized ending chronic homelessness since day one, and making sure that everyone has a place to call home," said Mayor Marty Walsh, who was out counting Wednesday night, too, according to a release.

This year, 330 volunteers canvassed 45 areas across every neighborhood, Logan Airport, and the transit and parks systems. Volunteers canvassed their assigned areas, identified those sleeping on the street and conducted a short survey. The surveys will be analyzed and cross-checked and combined with the results of the  simultaneous she The results from this year's homeless census will be available in the coming months, according to officials. 


Last year some 1,779 individuals were using Boston's Emergency Shelter system, up from the 1,762 who were counted the year before. In 2018 Boston saw a decrease of about 12 percent in the number of people sleeping on the street. In January last year, there were 163 counted as sleeping on the street down from 186 in January 2017.  


There were no families staying on the streets or unsheltered in Boston on the night of the census. 

Boston's Way Home, the city's plan to end chronic and veteran homelessness was started in 2015. It focuses on ensuring anyone who enters the shelter system get on a path toward permanent and stable housing.

In 2017, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development named Boston the city with the lowest percentage of unsheltered people living on the street of any city conducting a census. Last year, fewer than 3 percent of Boston's homeless population was sleeping on the street. The annual homeless census is required by HUD as a key component of Boston's $26.3 million federal grant to support homelessness programs, according to the mayor's office.

In the past four years the mayor's office says the program has helped house 667 chronically homeless individuals, 915 homeless vets, partnered with six affordable housing owners to create a homeless veteran preference and created an action plan to support young people experiencing homelessness. 

The mayor's office said it has also reduced chronic homelessness in Boston by 20 percent from 2016 to 2018, and by 46 percent from 2008 to 2018.

Walsh recently announced a legislative package submitted to the Massachusetts Legislature with bills related to housing security that would prevent homelessness by helping existing tenants, particularly older adults, stay in their homes and create additional funding for affordable housing.

"Besides providing critical insight to guide our efforts to end homelessness while offering immediately assistance to individuals in need of shelter, the homeless census is always an opportunity to embrace who we are as a community, the values we share, and how deeply we care about one another," said Walsh in a statement. 



Photo by Jenna Fisher/Patch Staff >Common Folk: Poor People's Campaign Camps Out 




Learn More

This is a content preview space you can use to get your audience interested in what you have to say so they can’t wait to learn and read more. Pull out the most interesting detail that appears on the page and write it here.

Find out more

NEWS 3/12/2019

After Soul Searching, Gov. Gavin Newsom

 Will Halt Executions in California 

TIM ARANGO 1 hr ago © Eric Risberg/Associated Press 

A condemned inmate is led out of his cell on at San Quentin State Prison in California, which has a quarter of the country’s death row inmates. 

LOS ANGELES — Gov. Gavin Newsom will announce a moratorium on capital punishment on Wednesday, granting a temporary reprieve for the 737 inmates who wait on the largest death row in the Western Hemisphere.  The move is highly symbolic because legal challenges have already stalled executions in California; the last one was in 2006. But death penalty opponents hope that because of California’s size and political importance, the governor’s action will give new urgency to efforts to end executions in other states as popular support for the death penalty wanes.


Supporters of capital punishment said the move went against the will of the state’s residents. California voters have rejected an initiative to abolish the death penalty and in 2016, they approved Proposition 66 to help speed it up.

“I think this would be a bold step and I think he’s got to be aware of the political downside,” said Michael D. Rushford, president of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, an organization in Sacramento that favors the death penalty and helped draft the ballot proposition. “Voters have had multiple opportunities in California over three decades to abandon the death penalty and they’ve shut them down at every chance.”

Former Gov. Jerry Brown, a liberal who made criminal justice reform in California a hallmark of his legacy, resisted calls to commute California’s death sentences before he left office in January.

His refusal was in some ways a political gift to Mr. Newsom, giving him the opportunity to take a high-profile position with national significance early in his administration. In 2004, Mr. Newsom took a similar tack as mayor of San Francisco, when he legalized gay marriage in the city at a time when even the Democratic Party opposed it.

With capital punishment, Mr. Newsom is not at the vanguard of the opposition movement. The death penalty has been on the decline in America for two decades. But it has become a defining issue for him, widening the dividing line between California and the policies of President Trump, who has spoken out in favor of the death penalty, even for drug dealers.

In an executive order Mr. Newsom plans to sign on Wednesday, he will do three things: grant reprieves to the inmates currently on death row — they will still be under a death sentence, but not at risk of execution; close the execution chamber at San Quentin prison; and withdraw the state’s lethal injection protocol, the formally approved procedure for carrying out executions.

“I do not believe that a civilized society can claim to be a leader in the world as long as its government continues to sanction the premeditated and discriminatory execution of its people,” Mr. Newsom plans to say on Wednesday, according to prepared remarks. “In short, the death penalty is inconsistent with our bedrock values and strikes at the very heart of what it means to be a Californian.”

Even before Mr. Newsom made his announcement, supporters of the death penalty predicted legal challenges to any moratorium. Michele Hanisee, the president of the Association of Deputy District Attorneys in Los Angeles said that reprieves for condemned inmates would be, “in effect, invalidating the law” that California voters have repeatedly affirmed, despite the liberal values that dominate the state.

“I think it surprises me too, sometimes,” she said. “California is liberal, I think we all know that. We have Hollywood, and the music industry, which I think affects people’s thinking. I think with the death penalty it comes down to specifics of cases. We have serial killers and lots of bad people in California.”

Mr. Newsom has long said he is morally opposed to capital punishment. In 2012, he was the only statewide official to publicly support a ballot initiative to repeal it, and he has said in interviews that the question of what he would do if confronted with the possibility of an execution on his watch weighed heavily on him.

Mr. Newsom’s move will surely be applauded by liberal activists, members of his own party and many conservatives, some of whom have come to see the death penalty as exorbitantly costly and have argued against it on economic grounds.

Three other governors — in Oregon, Colorado and Pennsylvania — have issued moratoriums on the death penalty. In other states, the practice has been abolished by either legislatures or courts. The latest was Washington, which last year became the 20th state to end capital punishment when the State Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional, after a moratorium issued by the governor.

“A moratorium in California has enormous symbolic value,” said Robert Dunham, the executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. “It’s part of the momentum we are seeing.”

But in 2016, Californians doubled down on the death penalty, approving a measure that streamlined the appeals process, which has typically taken about 25 years in California for condemned prisoners. The initiative, which was backed by many law enforcement officials and prosecutors, passed with 51 percent of the vote, belying California’s national image as place where politics was steadily moving to the left. It was approved at the same time that voters legalized marijuana.

Even without a moratorium, capital punishment in California has stalled in the courts because of challenges to the state’s use of a three-drug protocol, which can cause painful deaths. New death sentences have been on the wane.

But the endurance of the death penalty in California has acted as a check on the national movement against capital punishment, said Shilpi Agarwal, a staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union in San Francisco who is involved in the lethal injection litigation.

“It is a state people look to to set the tone for national policy,” she said. “The fact that so many states have abolished the death penalty — but California hasn’t — has given people cover for this narrative that people are still supportive the death penalty.”

In an interview last fall during his campaign for governor, Mr. Newsom cited his Irish Catholic, Jesuit background, saying he opposed capital punishment for “moral, ethical and economic reasons.”

He said he had been reading former President Bill Clinton’s memoir, highlighting passages about how he faced the death penalty as governor of Arkansas. Asked if he would sign a death warrant if a planned execution reached his office, he said then, “I’m not prepared to answer that question, because I’m not prepared to answer the question. And in that preparation comes a lot of soul searching.”

California governors are limited in their power to commute sentences, but they do have the power to issue temporary reprieves. A moratorium, said Stefanie Faucher of the 8th Amendment Project, an organization that opposes capital punishment, is “functionally a series of reprieves.”

In order to commute death sentences to life in prison for death row inmates that have a prior felony, which many do, Mr. Newsom would need approval from the California Supreme Court.

California, which reinstated the death penalty in 1978, has 737 inmates on death row in San Quentin prison, about a quarter of the total number of death row inmates in the United States. But only 13 executions have been carried out since 1978. The last one, in 2006, was of Clarence Ray Allen, who was executed 23 years after his conviction for hiring someone to carry out three murders.

Opponents of the death penalty, including Mr. Newsom, have long argued that the practice is rife with racial disparities and is not justified by the high cost to state taxpayers. One study, in 2011, found that California pays $184 million a year to sustain capital punishment — or close to an accumulated $5 billion since the practice was reinstituted in 1978.

In February, Mr. Newsom intervened in a high-profile death row case that for years activists have claimed was a prime example of racial injustice.

Kevin Cooper, a black man who was convicted of four brutal murders by stabbing in 1983, has long maintained his innocence. His supporters have put forward evidence that he was framed by San Bernardino police officers. Mr. Newsom ordered DNA testing in the case, something that state officials had refused to do in the past.

The possibility of a wrongful convictions — nationally, more than 150 people on death row have been exonerated since the mid-1970s, according to the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty — has also energized the opposition movement, around the country and in California.

Last April in California, a man who had been on death row for 25 years for murdering a young girl, a former farmworker named Vicente Figueroa Benavides, was freed after a court determined that testimony given at his trial was false.



image10